One CV, every job you have open
Candidates apply once. We read the CV, ask only what it does not already answer, then rank them against every role you have open, including the ones they would never have clicked on. A person still makes every decision.
How it works
Three steps, and the candidate does one of them
They upload a CV
No account, no forty box form. Most people finish in under three minutes, which is why more of the good ones finish at all.
We ask what's missing
We read the document first, so the questions are only the ones your adverts ask and their CV leaves open. About ten rather than forty.
You get a reading order
Everyone scored against every open role, with the evidence quoted from their own words. Nobody is rejected. You decide who to meet.
Why it matters
The best candidate for a job usually applied for a different one
They picked the advert whose title they recognised. The team that received it turned them down, correctly. The team that wanted them never saw the application, and no report anywhere will ever tell you about the person you lost that way.
per open role before a single interview. Two hundred and fifty applications at four minutes each, plus shortlisting, plus replying to everyone who was not right.
a month is most of a working week spent deciding who not to meet.
is what that month costs on Growth, less than a day of the time it replaces.
Built for the questions you'll be asked
Evidence, not a black box
It never rejects anybody
It produces a reading order and a person decides, which is what keeps this clear of GDPR Article 22.
Every score quotes the CV
Each reason names the requirement and quotes the line it came from. Recruitment AI is high risk under the EU AI Act, and this was built on that assumption.
It sits in front of your ATS
Nothing to migrate, nobody to retrain. What reaches your existing system is already in order.